Mainly need to get Java 6 Runtime working for Abobe Suite 5. Anybody know what I can do. Java for macOS 2017-001 installs the legacy Java 6 runtime for macOS 10.13 High Sierra, macOS 10.12 Sierra, macOS 10.11 El Capitan. Java Download Se 6 Mac Os.Click on the Download button on the Mac support page. And not anything specific about it, not even the stupid parroting that it's "slow", just things like "it's an abomination" etc.How to resolve Java SE 6 runtime message on Mac OSX 10.10 Yosemite & 10.11 El Capitan Click on the More Info button. Not any specific aspect or technology of Java, just "Java". Over the last few weeks it has somehow become trendy on Slashdot to make ridiculous jabs at "Java". The hacks work on 2018 and later Macs because the T2.This is starting to get ridiculous. For iPhone 4s to iPhone X.
![]() The fact that Slashdot has now become a playground for groundlessly insulting "Java" in the hopes of scoring a few mod points from the (as usual) hopelessly juvenile Slashdot moderators, makes me sad.I know it's not trendy to bust into your acerbic sarcasm-filled world with my serious comment here. It does offer a lot to users of all platforms, and has been doing so for quite some time now. In fact, it doesn't just suggest this to me. Java Se6 Free Developer ToolsLeave Java alone.What reaaly bothers me about Apple is that their support for anything that doesn't come out of Cupertino seems to be either designed to bait end users into moving to Macs than anything else.When Apple brought out OS X in 2001, it was all smiles as the system came with free developer tools, a Java-Cocoa API that allowed you to use Java to write native Cocoa apps as well as a C/C++ API that also allowed you to write native Mac apps.The problem was that the Java-Cocoa api was buggy from the start, apart from having very slow response on a, at the time, very slow user interface. As someone who supports and uses Java, I'm getting sick and tired of standing by while Slashdot scheisters such as Mr Coward here hi-five each other every day for upping the Java-deprecation ante.Go poke fun at BASIC or something. There is a wide diversity of tools and technologies out there, all with unique advantages. Yet unfortunately, all you are doing by making these sorts of jokes is needlessly acting to divide a healthy open-source community and reduce enthusiasm for Java. NET missionaries) who would seriously want to see the downfall of Java anytime soon. ![]() I had to answer any and all questions at WWDC '97 and '98 about moving to ObjC/Cocoa-it wasn't for a lack of technical clarifications and help that kept them from moving forward: it was a deliberate vision and decions not to move ahead. I think in some ways all companies took the best paths open to them, it just happens here near the end game we have something of a discontinuity.Microsoft I feel less sorry for than Adobe as they have a more purely OS X focused product and don't have to try to engineer a cross platform codebase (as far as I know there's really no Office UI code shared from Windows to the Mac version and the Mac BU is pretty independent).The date was pushed out because Adobe, Macromedia and Microsoft were refusing to move, firstly to Carbon, and later to Cocoa. Adobe/Macromedia and Microsoft had a very long run-at least 8 years more than they were expected with Carbon.But then wasn't the date pushed out as "large companies" had some trouble with transition? I agree that they should have planned to that date but at that point, the date may have been ambitious given the changes OS X and Cocoa itself would undergo in the intervening years. 2007 End of Life for Carbon listed. That was unfortunate for both Apple and Adobe, but in the long run it's going to make everyone switch to a single API sooner which means more support can go into maintaining and improving one API rather than two.As a side note, just because Cocoa is more of an Objective-C API doesn't mean you can't easily call it from C/C++ code.1997 WWDC Carbon transition API released. Note that Lightroom has no issues in that regard. The Java-Cocoa bridgeThese are not trivial tasks they require some expertise of OS X and PowerPC internals. Particularly a few months ago when Leopard shipped without Java 6.What makes the port to OS X harder than, say, Linux? Among other things:* Porting the hotspot virtual machine to PPC* native libraries, e.g. Patience.Now on the other matter, the OS X Java, there have been pleadings from Java developers in the past for Sun to take the reins and do an official port. But in coming months we'll hopefully see the BSD and, by extension, Landon Fuller's OS X work hosted in the main openjdk codebase. There's a FreeBSD Java project now.And Sun has recently announced that they'll be supporting Java on the iPhone.But if you have a Mac, Sun tells you to bugger off and ask Apple.I'm sure there's some good historical reason for this weird exception, but given that Sun's supporting Java on much smaller platforms than Mac OS X, wouldn't it be in Sun's interest to take on the Mac as well if whatever legacy business agreement with Apple isn't working out? If they did that, then possibly it'd even become possible to get up-to-date Java support for older versions of OS X.How about it, Sun, are you willing to put your programmers where your mouth is?On licensing, the BSD port licensed its code from Sun under a different license before Java went GPL.At the moment, legal eagles are working through some paperwork regarding acceptance of this code into the GPL source tree. And download Java.Last time I installed it on FreeBSD, I used the Linux binaries in Linus emulation mode. Best android emulator for mac os10But what competitive advantage they deem to have when their releases are a full version behind Linux, Solaris and Windows is debatable.Would Apple publish changes back to openjdk? They seem reluctant to. They have sought to maintain their own Java port for competitive reasons such as low level OS integration. Would Sun be willing to 'buy back' Apple's source tree and GPL it? Some OS X internals Apple may not wish to expose (IP issues) and like Sun's codebase be encumbered by code they don't own.Ultimately some of the ball is in Apple's court. And for 10%, or thereabouts, of the desktop market they obviously don't see a cost benefit. For Sun to replicate these existing features from scratch would take many man years. ![]() This will only affect the tinkerers that happen to be running the latest version of OSX on 64-bit hardware, or developers that are fortunate enough to be able to target an audience that uses modernish technology.So, nothing to see here unless you're a bleeding-edge Java+Mac fanboi.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorMichael ArchivesCategories |